Evidence-informed Paragard IUD review

Paragard IUD lawsuit documentation and intake checklist

Paragard reviews focus on IUD implant and removal records, documentation of device fracture or breakage, and injury or surgical records related to the removal complication.

Start your private reviewReview campaign information
Paragard Lawsuits

According to the claims, the device fractures when it is removed, resulting in catastrophic injuries and the need for surgery. Claimants contend that Paragard is defective and that the manufacturers failed to appropriately warn about the potential of device breakage and damage.

Paragard Lawsuit Facts
FAQs

Pain, infertility, injuries from broken IUD pieces imbedding in organs, need for surgery

    Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc., Teva Women’s Health Inc., Teva Women’s Health LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D Inc., The Cooper Companies Inc. and CooperSurgical Inc.

      MDL 2974 in the Northern District of Georgia

        Injuries and Complications in Lawsuits
        Injuries claimed in lawsuits include:
        • Perforation of the uterus or cervix
        • Inflammations and allergic reactions to IUD pieces left in the body
        • IUD migration
        • IUD pieces missing or lodged in organs
        • Infertility
        • Need for surgery such as hysterectomy, laparoscopy or laparotomy
        • Pain
        • Infection
        • Broken IUD pieces cannot be removed

        Suits allege that the device broke when it was removed, resulting in injuries.

        “Paragard removal is noninvasive and can be done by a healthcare professional during a typical office visit in just a few minutes,” according to Cooper Surgical’s website.

        According to the instructions for removal given in the prescribing material, the device’s arms are designed to fold up when removed.

        However, according to complaints filed by women, Paragard shattered during removal, leaving shards of the IUD in their bodies. The device had to be removed and issues treated in some women, which necessitated surgery.

        After removing Paragard, are you experiencing major adverse effects?
        Free Case Review

        In December 2020, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation in the Northern District of Georgia presided over by Judge Leigh Martin May, merged dozens of claims from across the country. Trials have yet to be scheduled as of January 28, 2021.

        Case Review Form
        State
        Evidence-informed Paragard IUD review

        Campaign guidance, records, and sources

        Review the supporting information below before or after completing the private campaign form.

        Go to this campaign form Sources and records
        Evidence1 referenced source

        Official and authoritative background links used for intake education.

        Prepare4 record categories

        A practical checklist to help organize useful details before review.

        Reviewed05/15/2026

        Reviewed for intake accuracy by AMMS Compliance Team

        Records and details that may help

        • Insertion and removal records identifying the Paragard device (batch or lot number if available)
        • Operative records documenting device breakage, arm fracture, or embedded components during removal
        • Post-removal surgical records, pathology reports, and treating physician information
        • Any complications experienced before removal, such as pain, migration, or partial expulsion

        Sources used for intake education

        These official references are provided for background education only. They do not replace medical or legal advice.

        1. Submit the intake form

        Share your contact details and answer the existing campaign-specific questions.

        2. Organize supporting details

        Gather the records, dates, communications, and other details listed for this campaign.

        3. Intake follow-up

        AMMS or an authorized intake partner may contact you for missing or clarifying details.

        4. Legal review if appropriate

        Qualified legal professionals decide whether a claim can move forward. AMMS does not provide legal advice or guarantee results.

        Frequently asked questions

        What does Paragard arm fracture mean for an injury review?

        Paragard IUDs have plastic arms that can break during removal, leaving fragments that may require additional surgery. Operative records documenting such breakage are important for intake review.

        Can I submit a review if I had the Paragard removed years ago?

        Yes. The timing of the removal and complication is important context, but you can still submit intake information regardless of when the removal occurred.

        Related AMMS resources

        AMMS Legal Intake Research TeamReviewed for intake accuracy by AMMS Compliance TeamLast reviewed: 05/15/2026
        Important: AMMS provides intake and educational information. We are not providing medical or legal advice on this page, and submitting a form does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case value, eligibility, filing deadlines, and legal strategy must be reviewed by qualified professionals.